Home / Archives /Vol. 13 No. 3 : June / Articles
Qualitative Research in Education
Vol. 13 No. 3 : June
loading ... The Author(s) 2024

Perspectives of Open Education High Students on the Open Learning Mode

Mesut Demirbilek1, & Sıtar Keser1


Abstract

Open education is an education and instruction network that is widely used to overcome physical and temporal limitations. In the current study, an evaluation was made by taking the opinions of students on the application areas of the open education system in Turkey. In this context, the reasons for students attending open education high schools to switch to open education high schools were examined and a general perspective on open education applications was presented in line with their goals and expectations. To this end, phenomenology, one of the qualitative research methods, was used and students’ opinions and experiences about open education were elicited. The sample of the current study is comprised of 500 open education high school students registered through public education centres. An online questionnaire form consisting of semi-structured open-ended questions was used to collect data in the study. When the findings were examined, it was seen that the reasons for the participants’ enrolment in open education differed. In the analysis performed, it was seen that the reasons for enrolling in open education were grouped under six sub headings: individual-emotional reasons, familial reasons, economic reasons, health-related reasons, reasons arising from school education processes and environmental-stimulating reasons.


Keywords

Formal education, open education, employment, professional development, accessibility, flexibility


Literature Review


Conclusion


References

Altunışık, R., Coşkun, R., Bayraktaroğlu, S.,& Yıldırım, E. (2010). Sosyal Bilimlerde
Araştırma Yöntemleri SPSS Uygulamalı [Research Methods in Social Sciences SPSS
Applied] (6. Baskı). Sakarya Yayıncılık.
European Commission (2011). Reducing early school leaving. Eur-lex. https://eur
lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/lexuriserv.do?uri=sec:2011:0096:fın:en:pdf
Bagarinao, R. T. (2020). Open admission: Rethinking the use of admission criteria in degree
programs.In Lumanta, M. F. & Flor, A. G.. (eds.) Conversations On Openness: An
Engagement In Discourse Capture. University Of The Philippines Open Unıversıty.
Baydar, M. L., Gül, H., &Akçil, A. (2007). Bilimsel araştırmanın temel ilkeleri [Basic
principles of scientific research].Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Basımevi.
Belen, A., Kandak, M., Demir, E., Çekin, B., Demir, M., & Kandak, D. (2021). Açık lise
öğrencilerinin görüşleri doğrultusunda açık liseyi tercih nedenlerinin belirlenmesi:
Ermenek örneği [Determining the reasons for open high school preference in line with the
opinions of open high school students: the case of Ermenek]. Uygulamalı Sosyal Bilimler
ve Güzel Sanatlar Dergisi, 3(6), 99-114. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article
file/1742659
Çakır, Ö. & Kezer, F. (2013). Reasons for enrollment in open elementary school and
students’ views on open elementary school practices. Global Journal of Human Social
Science
Linguistics
&
Education,
13(9),
https://globaljournals.org/GJHSS_Volume13/7-Reasons-for-Enrollment-in-Open
Elementary.pdf
49-56.
Can, E. &Sakallı, A. (2023). Örgün öğretimden açık liseye geçiş nedenleri: Bir durum
çalışması [Reasons for transition from formal education to open high school: A case
study.]. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi (AUAD),9(1), 194-237.
https://doi.org/10.51948/auad.1214224
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th edition).
Routledge.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods
approaches. SAGE Publications.
in-depth
Eysenbach, G.,& Köhler, C. (2002). How do consumers search for and appraise health
information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests,
and
interviews.
British
Medical Journal [BMJ], (324), 573-576.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7337.573
Farrow, R. (2014). Open education handbook. Open Knowledge. https://oerpolicy.eu/wp
content/uploads/sites/4/2017/07/Open-Education-Handbook.pdf
Flor, A. G. (2020). The invisible teacher. In Lumanta, M. F. & Flor, A. G.. (eds.)
Conversatıons on openness: An engagement ın discourse capture(pp.1-21). Open
University of The Philippines.
Gravetter, J. F., & Forzano, L. B. (2012). Research methods for the behavioral sciences.
Linda Schreiber-Ganster.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of
naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30 (4), 233
252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765185
Hidalgo, M-S. P. (2020). An exploration of open curriculum in the context of social
transformation. In Lumanta M. F. & Flor, A. G. (eds.) Conversatıons On Openness: An
Engagement In Discourse Capture. University Of The Philippines Open Unıversıty.
Hylén, J. (2006). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. OECD’s Centre
for Educational Research and Innovation. www.oecd.org/edu/ceri.
Katene, I.,
Katans, E. & Vāvers, V. (2021). Open education as a philosophically
methodological basis for distance education. Proceedings of the International Scientific
Conference, (2),267-282. https://doi.org/10.17770/sie2021vol2.6385
Krelja Kurelovic, E. (2016). Advantages and limitations of usage of open educational
resources in small countries. International Journal of Research in Education and Science
(IJRES), 2(1), 1